We began our tablet program this year with our 9th graders. Our goal, of course, is to integrate technology seamlessly and make it a part of our culture. Right now, I am having a small “crisis of faith”.
I chose to begin the program by focusing on paper reduction. I felt that these were skills all of my teachers could understand and work together to achieve right now. My expectations were that from this starting point we would move towards a new way of teaching by exploring all of the possibilities made available by this connection to the rest of the world. I am proud and happy to say that many of my teachers are already doing some really creative things.
My confusion currently is with my 9th grade algebra program. The Math teachers took me at my word and resolved to create a paperless classroom. They created One Note sections for each chapter which included practice worksheets in .jnt format inserted in the pages. The students copy and ‘unpack” these One Note sections into their Algebra Notebooks as they begin each new chapter. The notes taken in class and the several worksheets for each chapter are all together in one place. Individual .jnt format worksheets can be put in the dropbox, graded and returned electronically to the students.
We continue to have instances of students accidentally deleting the .jnt icons and not hitting the “undo” button soon enough. The fact that the screen is so small and there is no room to “spread out” has been another complaint. All in all, most of the students are not at all happy with the system and would prefer paper and pencil.
The most important thing is for them to learn their algebra. That is difficult enough. Why should this tool make it even more difficult? If we continue to teach exactly the same way, this new technology does not make things better. Is saving paper worth sacrificing learning? Of course it’s not.
So, where do I go from here? One of the teachers just asked me if she could go back to paper. If I say yes, am I taking a step backwards or forwards?
Tags: 1:1
Share
-
▶ Reply to This